![]() ![]() Following this, if the situation necessitates, a more adversarial approach can be taken. In circumstances where more than one other applicant is involved, ensuring that you tailor your communication such it that does not appear to be generic or haphazard will also place you in good stead. au direct domain name.Īccordingly, in the first instance, we would recommend keeping any communication with competing applicants open and through a commercial (rather than legal) lens, setting out why you believe you/the entity you are representing is the most appropriate to hold the domain name, and including examples to support such a contention. au direct domain name during the Priority Allocation Window purely as a defensive means of brand protection, and may be happy to withdraw their application upon communicating with another party who has a legitimate claim to the. Out of concern that this may result in bad actors or those without legitimate interests registering for their equivalent name, some individuals or entities may have applied for their. au direct domain name have an ‘Australian presence’, being an ABN, ACN or Australian trade mark. au domains, auDA simply requires that the Registrant of a. Do you have a business name or registered trade mark that suggests you are the true owner of the brand at issue? Do you otherwise hold multiple versions of the domain name? Is the other party even using the domain name that they were eligible to apply for the. Once you have confirmed who exactly you will be negotiating with, it is pertinent to think about your approach and how you will communicate with your competing applicant/s. In this respect, conducting a brief Google search of the other applicant/s helps in obtaining a clearer idea of the party/parties involved and their intentions in applying for the domain name in the first instance. ![]() We note that some entities may have engaged a trustee service or specialist IT provider to hold a domain name on their behalf, and accordingly, there may be inaccurate information listed against the Registrant details. which should assist you in reaching the most appropriate person or entity to negotiate with. However, by using auDA’s ‘WhoIs’ search (linked above) you should be able to identify the following details: While the domain names of competing applicants are listed against auDA’s Priority Status Tool, this does not reveal who exactly you should be contacting. Identify the other party’s/parties’ contact details through auDA’s ‘WhoIs’ search I am an applicant of one of these contested domain names, how should I go about negotiation 1. Of these, 85% would involve negotiations between two or more parties. au direct domain names suggested that 6,460 names would need to be the subject of negotiation before they could be successfully registered. ![]() au direct domain name are required to negotiate amongst themselves to determine who will secure the domain name, with the Australian domain name authority ( auDA) leaving the associated domain name essentially in ‘limbo’ until only one applicant remains listed against the domain name on its Priority Status Tool.ĪuDa’s most recently released statistics on contested. au direct articles ( here, here and here), competing applicants to a. au equivalent only to realise that another party had done the same (eg the Registrant of and Registrant of ), the road to securing their ‘direct’ domain name is not as straightforward.Īs noted in our previous. au domain names are now available to the public for registration.įor those who applied for their. au direct domain names closed, with all unopposed applicants now the registered holders of their applied for domain names. It has now been almost two months since the Priority Allocation Window for.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |